Broad Opposition from the Hill to OPM Retirement Cuts

Republicans and Democrats in Congress sent a letter late last week to Speaker of the House Paul Ryan regarding the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) proposal to cut federal employee retirement benefits.

As summarized by Government Executive, the proposal would have a number of effects, including measures to “eliminate Federal Employees Retirement System supplements for employees who retire before age 62; increase employee contributions to FERS by 1 percentage point per year until they reach an overall contribution level of 7.25 percent, matching the government’s share; change the basis of defined benefit annuity payments from an employee’s highest three years of salary to his or her highest five years; and eliminate cost-of-living adjustments for FERS retirees—both current and future—and reduce Civil Service Retirement System COLAs by 0.5 percent.”

The White House is said to have “pushed for lawmakers to include the cuts in the fiscal 2019 National Defense Authorization Act,” which is scheduled to be marked up on Wednesday.

Although the plan is generally believed to align with the president’s workforce agenda, several Republicans were vocal in their opposition, including Congressman Mike Turner (R-OH), who asked Pon to rescind the proposal.

Turner wrote in a separate letter sent last week, “Despite their hard work and dedication, few groups have been asked to sacrifice more than federal employee. Since the start of the Great Recession in 2008, federal workers have foregone $182 billion in the form of pay and benefit cuts . . . With the United States’ growing economy and a tightening labor market, we cannot afford to make the federal government a less attractive place to work by diminishing the very benefits that help the government keep pace with jobs in the (often higher-paying) private sector.”

Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA), whose district contains many federal employees, said he was receiving concerned questions about the proposal.

“In fact, I spoke today at a federal government luncheon, and a couple hands went up at the end for questions,” Beyer said. “The first question was, ‘Are you going to fight this new OPM suggestion?’ I went on for a minute about how I would, and then when I looked around, there were no more hands up. I asked, ‘What happened?’ And someone replied, ‘We all had the same question.’”

Posted in Featured News


This Week on FEDtalk

Long Term Planning and Supplemental Insurance Options for Feds

Weighing the pros and cons of various insurance options can be difficult.  Tune into FEDtalk this Friday for a clear explanation of the long term planning and supplemental insurance options available to federal employees.

Read more ...

Hear it from FLEOA

FLEOA Highlights Important Policy, People During Police Week

The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA) is continually committed to serving our members and the federal law enforcement community. This Police Week, FLEOA has dedicated special time and attention to pushing policy that helps the law enforcement community protect and serve their community. From events highlighting the importance of police to meetings on the Hill, FLEOA is excited to engage the public and policy makers on law enforcement issues during this time of heightened awareness.

Read more ...

The free weekly e-report for Federal Law Enforcement

Get in touch with us

Email FEDagent publisher

Copyright 2019
Hosted by Peak Media Company, LLC