Social Feeds

Be sure to Like and Follow FEDagent on Facebook for exclusive content and news stories affecting your career as federal law enforcement.

Subscribe!

Subscribe to our newsletter. It's FREE! Read our privacy policy
Print

NOAA's Office of Law Enforcement Cites Florida Man for Violating Marine Mammal Protection Act

Written by FEDagent on . Posted in The Takedown

NOAA’s Office of Law Enforcement issued a written warning this month to a Florida man, Anthony Armento, who is accused of violating the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).  The MMPA prohibits people from harassing, capturing, hunting, or killing whales or other marine mammals. MMPA violations can result in civil penalties of up to $11,000 and criminal penalties up to $100,000 and imprisonment of up to a year, or both.

“The MMPA is the primary mechanism that we have to manage and conserve marine animals in the United States,” stated NOAA marine mammal scientist Erin Fougeres. “It does make it illegal to harass, hunt, capture, kill or attempt to do any of those things to a marine mammal.”

The alleged harassment occurred on December 16 in the waters off Pompano Beach, Florida. That morning, a man was seen getting on top of a sperm whale languishing in shallow waters. The whale was pronounced dead hours later the same day.

NOAA’s decision to issue Armento a written citation was to document the violation, as well providing justification for future action should Armento be cited again.

Witness photographs helped law enforcement officials identify Armento as the violator, and have led to arrests in other cases involving harassment of marine mammals. NOAA encourages anyone who sees possible violations of the Marine Mammal Protection Act to report it to NOAA’s enforcement hot line at 1-800-853-1964.

Full coverage of this takedown was provided by NBC’s local affiliate in Miami. Read the full story here.

Takedowns

Mailing of Pipe Bombs and Threatening Letters Stating "BANG!! YOU'RE DEAD." Lands Iowa Man in Prison for 37 Years

A former Iowa machinist has been sentenced to prison for mailing two pipe bombs and a dozen threatening letters to investment firms and advisors to help increase the value of the stock he owned in two companies.

John Tomkins, from Dubuque, Iowa, received 37 years in prison for, among other things, using a destructive device while mailing a threatening communication. Evidence presented at trial showed that the mailed parcels contained improvised explosive weapons (“pipe bombs”) which were capable of exploding and causing serious injury or death. Each parcel also contained a letter which stated “BANG!! YOU’RE DEAD.” Some of the letters were signed by “THE BISHOP” and concluded with “TIC TOC.”

Read more...

GEICO's Good Stuff

Navy Prepares to Purchase Ship Network Systems

GEICO’s Good Stuff is a column series highlighting great stuff happening in the federal community.

The Navy may soon be looking to procure standard networking computing equipment for its ships and submarines, according to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command.

Navy is expecting to release a request for proposals for the systems before the end of May. The Command had previously awarded Northrop Grumman Corp. an initial contract for its Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services system in February 2012. That contract was valued at $637.8 million and covered installation of the gear on 54 ships.

Read more...

Case Law Update

Seventh Circuit holds that a Suspect's Inquiry "Can you Call my Attorney?" Invoked Right to Counsel

Casey Hunter was shot by police officers in the course of a pursuit.  While Mr. Hunter was in the hospital and under the influence of medically administered morphine, he was Mirandized so that law enforcement officers could interrogate him.  Before answering questions, Mr. Hunter requested that officers contact his parents and his criminal defense attorney; Mr. Hunter specifically asked “can you call my attorney?” and identified his attorney by name as Herb Schultz, a criminal defense attorney, who one of the interrogating officers had previously worked with on several occasions.  Mr. Hunter’s attorney was not called, and additional law enforcement officers then arrived and subsequently interrogated Mr. Hunter.  Mr. Hunter made incriminating statements during his interrogation.  The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the statements made after the request for access to counsel violated the suspect’s constitutional right to counsel and must be suppressed. 

Read more...