Social Feeds

Be sure to Like and Follow FEDagent on Facebook for exclusive content and news stories affecting your career as federal law enforcement.

Subscribe!

Subscribe to our newsletter. It's FREE! Read our privacy policy
Print

Official Convicted of Witness Tampering and Obstruction of Justice following Investigation led by DOI and DOE OIGs and FBI

Written by FEDagent on . Posted in The Takedown

The director of the school lunch program for the government of the U.S. Territory of American Samoa was convicted last week on charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice in relation to a bribery scheme investigated by the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Education, the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of the Interior and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Hawaii, according to a news release distributed by the Department of Justice.

A D.C. federal jury found Paul Solofa guilty of one count of witness tampering and one count of obstruction of justice after a four-day trial.

Federal authorities began investigating allegations of cash bribes and kickbacks paid by vendors to American Samoa government officials in relation to the purchase of school bus parts and services, according to evidence presented at trial.

According to trial evidence, Solofa met with a school bus parts vendor in early 2009 who informed Solofa that the FBI planned to interview the vendor regarding the bus parts investigation. Solofa allegedly told the vendor in a recorded conversation, "They cannot do anything with cash. Nothing. They cannot do anything with cash. . . . So you know, but the best thing for you to do is ‘nope, I never give them any cash'. . . . All you do is just tell them ‘no, yes, no, yes."

Several days after the recorded conversation, Solofa again met with the bus parts vendor who informed Solofa that a grand jury subpoena would be issued requiring production of specific documents and records relating to the bus parts kickbacks scheme. Solofa told the vendor that, in regards to documents he did not want to produce, "[t]he only way to do it with those copies is burn it. That way, they won't see it, and you won't worry that they might see it, you know. . . . Just burn it, and nobody has a copy."

Sentencing is scheduled for late April. Solofa faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000 on the witness tampering charge and 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on the obstruction of justice charge.

Takedowns

Multi-Agency Investigation Leads to 311 Patriot Act Designation Against Hisballah-Backed Institutions

Two Lebanese exchange houses have been identified as foreign financial institutions of primary money laundering concern, the U.S. Department of the Treasury recently announced.

This is the first time non-bank financial institutions have been identified under Section 311 of the USA Patriot Act, the department said, and the actions against Kassem Rmeiti & Co. For Exchange and Halawi Exchange Co. will help the Treasury Department target financial networks that support the terrorist organization Hizballah.

Read more...

GEICO's Good Stuff

DHS Hoping to Acquire iPhones and Tablets to ID Bomber Fingerprints

GEICO’s Good Stuff is a column series highlighting great stuff happening in the federal community.

Biometric iPhones could help the Homeland Security Department expedite the identification of suspects in bombings and other disasters.

DHS is looking for iPhones to better capture fingerprints, facial images and written descriptions to aid in the identification of persons of interest, according to a market survey released Friday. The department is also looking to acquire iPads and Windows-based tablets.

Read more...

Case Law Update

Sixth Circuit holds that Defendant's Action in Responding to Police Officer's Request to Look Inside Car's Locked Glove Compartment Box by Handing Over his Keys to Unlock Box, Even though Defendant gave no Verbal Response, was Sufficient Consent

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided the issue of whether the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress a gun that police found in his car’s locked glove box during a traffic stop when the defendant did not provide verbal consent after the police asked to look inside defendant’s glove box, but instead handed his keys to the police in response to their question.

Read more...