Social Feeds

Be sure to Like and Follow FEDagent on Facebook for exclusive content and news stories affecting your career as federal law enforcement.

Subscribe!

Subscribe to our newsletter. It's FREE! Read our privacy policy
Print

Justice Department Announces New Directive to Target Stolen Identity Refund Fraud

Written by FEDagent on . Posted in General News

The Justice Department’s Tax Division has released a directive to help law enforcement offices fight stolen identity refund fraud cases, DOJ announced this week.

The directive will allow certain prosecutors to charge by complaint criminals who are engaged in SIRF crimes and to obtain seizure warrants for forfeiture of criminally derived proceeds without prior authorization from the Tax Division

“Directive 144 and the new expedited review procedures are the result of a collaborative effort between the Tax Division and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to strengthen law enforcement’s response to stolen identity refund fraud crimes, which are an affront to all honest taxpayers,” said Tax Division Assistant Attorney General Kathryn Keneally. “The prosecution of these crimes is a national priority, and we will continue to look for the most effective ways to bring this conduct to an end and to punish these wrongdoers.”

Stolen Identity Refund Fraud crimes involve filing or attempting to file fraudulent tax refund claims. As a result, tax dollars are paid out to the fraudsters. The Justice Department hopes the directive will facilitate expedited review procedures with the Internal Revenue Service in order to identify fraudulent tax refund claims before the refunds are sent to fraudsters, DOJ said.

“Streamlining the authority to prosecute Stolen Identity Refund Fraud (SIRF) investigations is yet another step toward combating this fast growing crime,” said IRS Criminal Investigation Chief Richard Weber. “We look forward to working with the United States Attorneys in aggressively tackling ID theft which has turned the lives of so many innocent taxpayers upside down when their identities have been stolen by thieves whose sole motivation is greed.”

Hear it from FLEOA

A Year Without ATF

In the aftermath of the tragedy at Sandy Hook, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives continues to shrink in size due to hiring freezes and attrition, and our Congress continues to introduce gun control legislation. Concurrent with this, state, county and local law enforcement departments are suffering from severe budget cuts, anti-union legislation, and reduction in sworn personnel. So, while the gun control debate continues, ATF’s future continues to be ignored by the congressional appropriators. Should the myriad of bills that Congress introduced somehow pass into law, who will be left to enforce them?

Read more...

The Spotlight

ATF Reboot Plans Hit Wall

Plans to revitalize the embattled Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive (ATF) have stalled after a push to reshape the agency following the Newtown, Conn., school shooting. As part of President Barack Obama’s set of gun safety proposals, the nomination of B. Todd Jones to become permanent director of ATF was seen to be a controversial choice, with some onlookers predicting that Senate Republicans would attempt to block Jones’ appointment. Members of the Obama Administration had hoped that the shifting tone of the national gun debate would force Republicans to confirm Jones’ ascension to the top job full-time, but continued controversies from Jones’ past has made this less and less likely.

Read more...

Takedowns

Mailing of Pipe Bombs and Threatening Letters Stating "BANG!! YOU'RE DEAD." Lands Iowa Man in Prison for 37 Years

A former Iowa machinist has been sentenced to prison for mailing two pipe bombs and a dozen threatening letters to investment firms and advisors to help increase the value of the stock he owned in two companies.

John Tomkins, from Dubuque, Iowa, received 37 years in prison for, among other things, using a destructive device while mailing a threatening communication. Evidence presented at trial showed that the mailed parcels contained improvised explosive weapons (“pipe bombs”) which were capable of exploding and causing serious injury or death. Each parcel also contained a letter which stated “BANG!! YOU’RE DEAD.” Some of the letters were signed by “THE BISHOP” and concluded with “TIC TOC.”

Read more...

GEICO's Good Stuff

Navy Prepares to Purchase Ship Network Systems

GEICO’s Good Stuff is a column series highlighting great stuff happening in the federal community.

The Navy may soon be looking to procure standard networking computing equipment for its ships and submarines, according to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command.

Navy is expecting to release a request for proposals for the systems before the end of May. The Command had previously awarded Northrop Grumman Corp. an initial contract for its Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services system in February 2012. That contract was valued at $637.8 million and covered installation of the gear on 54 ships.

Read more...

Case Law Update

Seventh Circuit holds that a Suspect's Inquiry "Can you Call my Attorney?" Invoked Right to Counsel

Casey Hunter was shot by police officers in the course of a pursuit.  While Mr. Hunter was in the hospital and under the influence of medically administered morphine, he was Mirandized so that law enforcement officers could interrogate him.  Before answering questions, Mr. Hunter requested that officers contact his parents and his criminal defense attorney; Mr. Hunter specifically asked “can you call my attorney?” and identified his attorney by name as Herb Schultz, a criminal defense attorney, who one of the interrogating officers had previously worked with on several occasions.  Mr. Hunter’s attorney was not called, and additional law enforcement officers then arrived and subsequently interrogated Mr. Hunter.  Mr. Hunter made incriminating statements during his interrogation.  The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the statements made after the request for access to counsel violated the suspect’s constitutional right to counsel and must be suppressed. 

Read more...